Researchers at University of California San Diego School of Medicine, with colleagues from the
ACTIV-2 trial, part of the U.S. government’s response to COVID-19, investigated whether symptoms of COVID-19 recurred following a two-day symptom-free period in persons who did not receive any treatment for the disease.
They sought to determine whether such recurrences might be different from those that have been documented in persons treated with Paxlovid, a phenomenon known as Paxlovid rebound.
Writing in the Oct 27, 2022 issue of
JAMA Network Open, the scientists tracked 13 defined COVID-19 symptoms for 29 days in 158 untreated study participants. They found that more than one-third of the participants who reported complete resolution of symptoms for at least two consecutive days subsequently reported a return of symptoms.
Davey Smith MD, is head of Infectious Diseases and Global Public Health at UC San Diego School of Medicine and an infectious disease specialist at UC San Diego Health.
”It is clear that COVID-19 has waxing and waning of symptoms, whether they are treated or not,” said the study’s lead author
Davey M. Smith, MD, head of Infectious Diseases and Global Public Health at UC San Diego School of Medicine and an infectious disease specialist at UC San Diego Health.
In late-2021, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration issued an emergency use authorization for Paxlovid, a combination of two oral antiviral drugs (nirmatrelvir and ritonavir) that has since become the primary frontline treatment for COVID-19. Clinical trial data suggests Paxlovid significantly reduces the risk of severe illness, hospitalization and death.
But treatment efficacy has proven ephemeral in some cases, with a minority of patients experiencing either a reemergence of COVID symptoms after the five-day course of Paxlovid treatment or testing positive for the SARS-CoV-2 virus after a previous, negative test.
Earlier this year, Smith and colleagues published a
study that suggested Paxlovid rebound did not appear to involve drug resistance or impaired immunity, but might be a case of insufficient drug exposure. Other studies have reported similar results.
“COVID rebound is a real phenomenon. It is complex, involving multiple factors, and its biological underpinnings remain unclear. More research is required,” said Smith. “In this latest study, however, we wanted to see if symptom rebound also occurred during the natural history of COVID-19.
Colorized scanning electron micrograph of a cell infected with the Omicron strain of SARS-CoV-2 virus particles (pink), isolated from a patient sample.
To do so, they assessed eligible participants in a 2020 clinical trial assessing the safety and efficacy of an investigational drug to treat COVID-19. These study volunteers, however, had received a placebo. During the trial, participants completed a daily symptom diary, including weeks after initial resolution of their COVID-19 symptoms. At 28 days post-enrollment in the study, 108 of 158 participants (68 percent) said their symptoms had completely resolved, but 48 participants (30 percent of the total group) subsequently reported that at least one defined symptom had returned.
Most (85 percent) of the participants with recurring symptoms described them as mild; 15 percent as moderate; none as severe. The most common relapsing symptoms were cough, fatigue and headache. Eight of the 158 participants were hospitalized for their illnesses, but there were no deaths and none involved participants who had achieved symptom resolution, then experienced recurrence.
Co-authors include: Jonathan Z. Li, Harvard Medical School; Carlee Moser, Eunice Yeh and Michael D. Hughes, Harvard University; and Judith S. Currier and Kara W. Chew, UCLA.
Funding for this research came, in part, from the US Government’s Response to COVID-19 and the National Institutes of Health (grants UM1 AI068634, UM1 AI068636, and UM1 AI106701).
Disclosures: Smith has received fees from consulting work for Linear Therapies, Model Medicines, Kiadis Pharmaceutical, Bayer Pharmaceuticals, Signant Health, Evidera, Fluxergy, VxBioscience and Pharma Holdings outside the submitted work. Li has received grants from Merck outside of the submitted work. Currier has received fees for advisory board work from Merck outside of the submitted work. Chew has received research funding to her institution from Merck Sharp & Dohme, and consulting work for Pardes Biosciences. She also has a patent pending for ACTIV-2 COVID-19 acute and long-term symptom diaries that will be made available at no cost since they were developed with federal funding.